Saturday, 12 January 2019

Weinberg's date of birth

On which day of the year should we be celebrating Weinberg's centenary in 2019?

That might seem like a straight-forward question, but the answer is complex. The date that Weinberg and his family celebrated his birthday was 8 December, and this is the date on most of the surviving documents relating to the composer.

His date of birth can be brought into question, however, since his original birth certificate was lost during the destruction of Warsaw in the Second World War. He went to great lengths to receive a replacement in the 1980s, which also officially corrected his name to 'Mieczysław' (it had been changed to 'Moisey' by a border guard in 1939, but that's a separate story). This later document also gives the date of birth as '8 December 1919'.

Recent research has thrown doubt on this, however. Prof. Danuta Gwizdalanka, respected Polish musicologist and biographer of Weinberg, went through the archives of the Warsaw Conservatoire, where Weinberg was a student in the years 1931-1939.

Located there, Gwizdalanka found two documents that bring Weinberg's date of birth into question: his conservatoire application, and a birth certificate, seemingly copied from the original. Both documents list his date of birth as '12 January 1919', a sizeable difference from the acknowledged date (both also use the original Polish spelling for his surname, 'Wajnberg').

Images taken from culture.pl website.

The birth certificate states: 'This birth certificate has been transcribed into the Jewish Faith Metrical Books at the 7th police station of Warsaw on the 17th of January 1919 under no. 28'. The duplicate document was issued in May 1936. 

The application for entry to the Conservatoire is dated November 1931. 

Weinberg's second daughter has confirmed several times that Weinberg celebrated his birthday on 8 December. He was given a Polish medal for services to culture on his 75th birthday, and a small ceremony took place on 8 December 1994. What's more, the later Moscow birth certificate, dated 1981, also gives the 8 December date.

So why the discrepancy?

Aside from these two documents, all other evidence points to the 8 December date. The 12 January version can perhaps be explained when we examine the date that the application was submitted to the conservatoire. In November 1931, Weinberg would have been eleven years old, according to his acknowledged date of birth. The minimum age of entrants to the Warsaw Conservatoire was, however, twelve. The 12 January date conveniently raises Weinberg's age to be sufficient for entry.

If this is the case, Weinberg would hardly be unique in this respect (there are several other composers who misled about their age to gain conservatoire entry). The 1936 duplicate of the birth certificate is more difficult to account for, though it may have been a consequence of new laws on work permits for Jews in Warsaw 1936, which may have extended to continuing study at the conservatoire.

With that said, there is an outside chance that these two documents could be proof that we ought to be celebrating Weinberg's birth much earlier in the year. Or perhaps the discrepancy lends weight to the idea of celebrating his birth all year long (or, at the very least, between 12 January and 8 December)?

Or, perhaps, today should be the date for 'Happy Birthday, Weinberg'?

Further information (and images taken) from Danuta Gwizdalanka, 'Unknown Facts from Mieczysław Wajnberg's biography' - https://culture.pl/en/article/unknown-facts-from-mieczyslaw-wajnbergs-biography

Thursday, 10 January 2019

Abeliovich on Warsaw and Weinberg

Weinberg 100: 3

Lev Abeliovich (1912-1985) was born in Vilnius, and studied at the Warsaw Conservatoire from 1935, specialising in composition under Kazimierz Sikorski. As a result, he was one of Weinberg's classmates, and the two were close friends. Like Weinberg, Abeliovich enrolled at the Minsk Conservatoire during the war, though he remained there for the rest of his life (while Weinberg went on to Tashkent and then Moscow; the rest is history). Abeliovich was one of very few regular contacts with Weinberg's Polish childhood and education later in his later life, as his family have confirmed.
            Abeliovich recalled the following about their shared experiences in Warsaw:

Warsaw in the 1930s was a major music centre in Poland. The famous performers worked and performed there: the pianists (the Polish J. Hofmann, the German A. Schnabel), the famous Polish conductor G. Fitelberg, through whose interpretation I got acquainted with the works of Debussy, Ravel, Stravinsky, Schoenberg, Szymanowski, Prokofiev. The centre of musical culture was the Warsaw Conservatoire. There were outstanding performers and composers teaching there - A. Żuravlev, K. Sikorski, Z. Dżevetski, K. Szymanowski. Among the like-minded people who in many respects shared my destiny, were fellow students in the Warsaw and later Belorussian Conservatoires H. Vagner and E. Tyrmand. But the best, and perhaps the only close friend was Mieczysław Weinberg.

From: Svetlana Kovshik and Inessa Dvuzhil’naya, ‘Interv’yu, kotorogo ne bïlo’ [‘The interview that didn’t take place’], Mishpokha, 29; available online at: http://mishpoha.org/n29/29a24.php 

Monday, 7 January 2019

University of Manchester Weinberg conference

Weinberg 100: 2

One of the first major centenary celebrations of 2019 takes place 24-27 January at the University of Manchester, UK. This is an academic conference, running alongside a series of concerts (including a complete Quartet cycle performed by the University's quartet-in-residence, the Quatuor Danel).

The programme includes a veritable who's-who of Weinberg experts, including his family and friends. I've pasted the full programme below; full details (including booking) can be found here.

Thursday 24 January 
1.10 Quatuor Danel concert (buffet lunch available before and after)

2.15 Opening of Weinberg Exhibition, in association with The Polish Cultural Institute, Manchester and the Adam Mickiewicz Institute, Warsaw

2.30 Quatuor Danel with Dr Daniel Elphick (Royal Holloway, London). Workshop on reconstructing the original version of Weinberg’s String Quartet No. 1.

3.15 Open session on ‘Weinberg and Performance’

4.00 coffee break

4.30 David Fanning and Michelle Assay: ‘Weinberg research: Present and Future’

5.30 dinner

7.30 Quatuor Danel concert

Friday 25 January
9.30 Verena Mogl (University of Hamburg) ‘Weinberg’s early years’, Antonina Klokova (Humboldt-University, Berlin) ‘title tbc’, Aleksander Laskowski (Adam Mickiewicz Institute, Warsaw) ‘ Weinberg and Tuwim’

11.00 coffee break

11.30 Inessa Dvuzhilnaya (Grodno, Belarus) ‘Weinberg in Minsk’, Christoph Flamm (Musikhochschule Lübeck) ‘Weinberg’s piano-chamber music’.

1.00 Quatuor Danel concert (buffet lunch available before and after)

2.30 Nicky Gluch ‘Shamor V’zachor: Observing and Remembering Mieczysław Weinberg’; Yelena Prokhorova (‘European Cultural Initiative’ named after M. Weinberg, Berlin) ‘The violin and its a musical-theatrical role in the artistic work of Weinberg’, Virginie Constant (Paris) ‘Weinberg’s works for cello’

4.00 coffee break

4.30 Concert: Songs by Weinberg and Shostakovich (Rosalind Dobson and Michelle Assay)

5.30 dinner

7.30 Quatuor Danel concert

Saturday 26 January
9.30 Bret Werb (Holocaust Museum, Washington DC) ‘Weinberg in Washington’, Levon Hakobian (State Arts Research Institute, Moscow) ‘Weinberg as a Bronze Age Figure’, Stefan Weiss (Musikhochschule, Hannover) ‘“And music made tongue-tied by prosody ...”: Mieczysław Weinberg’s Opus 33 in the history of Russian settings of Shakespeare’s sonnets’

11.00 coffee break

11.30 Daniel Elphick (Royal Holloway, London) ‘Weinberg and Polish-Russian relations’, Agnieska Nowok-Zych (Karol Szymanowski Academy of Music, Katowice, Poland) ‘Three life stories – one joint truth. Weinberg, Tuwim, Broniewski: inspirations and parallels’.

1.00 Quatuor Danel concert (buffet lunch before or after)

2.30 Dmitry Abaulin (Stanislavsky and Nemirovich-Danchenko Theatre, Moscow), ‘Weinberg at the Stanislavsky and Nemirovich-Danchenko Theatre’, Tommy Persson (Gothenburg) ‘Weinberg’s last years’

4.00 coffee break

4.30 Concert: Weinberg Sonata for Double bass solo (Robert Carrillo Garcia) and Piano Sonata No. 6 (Michelle Assay)

5.45–7.15 dinner

7.30 Quatuor Danel concert

Sunday 27 January
10.00 interview with Victoria Bishops: ‘Letters from my father’

11.00 coffee break

11.30 round-table discussion

12.15 buffet lunch

1.00 Quatuor Danel concert (including Piano Quintet with David Fanning)

3.30 end of event

Thursday, 3 January 2019

Weinberg 100: 1



2019 marks the centenary of Weinberg's birth, with numerous events, concerts, and recordings set to mark the event. On this blog, I will begin a series of posts to mark the centenary, with 100 throughout the year. Some of these will be short features, such as photos, key works, or re-posts of older articles on this blog. Others will be previously unpublished sources and photos, posted here to promote further research and scholarship on Weinberg and his music.

For now, watch this space. Here's a performance of Weinberg's first opus-numbered work, the Lullaby for piano:


Monday, 26 November 2018

Review: CBSO Weinberg Weekend




Thanks to the ongoing efforts of conductor Mirga Gražinytė-Tyla, the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra are continuing their exploration of Weinberg’s music. It was a pleasure for me to stay in the city, as it is my ‘home turf’ from childhood (well, I’m from between Dudley and Wolverhampton, but the CBSO was the nearest orchestra in my formative years). Ahead of next year’s centenary, they hosted a series of concerts and talks last weekend, featuring sterling performances from all concerned. Here’s my brief review of the concerts:

Friday 23 November:
Gidon Kremer plays Weinberg’s 24 Preludes for Solo Cello (arr. Kremer)


Kremer has an outstanding reputation, closely associated with composers like Schnittke, Silvestrov, and Gubaidulina. He has been promoting Weinberg’s music for several years now, with several excellent recordings on the ECM label. Kremer himself has arranged Weinberg’s 24 Preludes for solo violin, resulting in an extremely demanding work. The Preludes themselves are tightly structured, ascending chromatically through the keys. Kremer maintains this structure, though this makes the act of arrangement more difficult (the easy route might have been to transpose the key to suit the violin better; as it stood, Kremer merely changes octave, preserving Weinberg’s original design). Kremer’s performance was accompanied by a slideshow of photos by Lithuanian photographer Antanas Sutkus, which alternate between humour and tragedy of Soviet life, with a significant focus on childhood. Kremer’s performance was virtuosic and often moving, and the combination with images was convincing (though I was left wondering whether it was absolutely necessary – the Preludes could arguably ‘stand’ on their own).


Saturday 24 November:
11am: Gidon Kremer and Kremerata Baltica: Bach, Weinberg, Schubert, and Silvestrov


The Saturday morning concert was given by Kremerata Baltica, a youthful ensemble led by Kremer, though he describes it ‘a musical democracy’. They continue to be one of the most innovative and exciting ensembles performing today: you can expect surprise at every concert. They began with Bach’s Chaconne in D minor for violin, arranged for string orchestra by Kremer (itself an arrangement of Ferruccio Busoni’s famous piano transcription of the piece). The opening was immediately surprising: the orchestra took their seats, but a recorded solo violin began with those infamous double-stopped chords. The orchestra continued, but the ghostly recording interjected at key moments throughout. The connection with Weinberg is apparent, as the Chaconne figures at the dramatic climax of his opera The Passenger. They then moved into Weinberg’s Concertino for Violin and String Orchestra, with Kremer giving a fine performance as soloist, though their ECM recorded version offers far greater warmth (perhaps a reflection of Birmingham Town Hall’s dry acoustic). The concert then concluded with an intriguing arrangement: combining Schubert with Silvestrov. That is, alternating, movement-by-movement, between the movements of two pieces by two very different composers. It helped that the Schubert was for the full ensemble of Kremerata Baltica, and the Silvestrov was for violin and piano (his Five Pieces for Violin and Piano, dedicated to Kremer), so a clear contrast was provided, in addition to the massive contrast in character between the two pieces. The effect was mixed, though the Silvestrov arguably came out the better in my opinion, helped by Georgijs Osokins sensitive piano accompaniment. Overall, this provided a more contemplative start to the day.


Saturday 24 November:
7pm: CBSO with Kremerata Baltica, Gidon Kremer, Maria Makeeva, cond. Mirga Gražinytė-Tyla: Weinberg and Shostakovich


By far the most substantial event of the weekend was a colossal orchestral concert, with the CBSO and Kremerata Baltica joining forces. The programme was immediately striking, as the CBSO paired Weinberg’s Symphony No. 21 with Shostakovich’s Symphony No. 15, two symphonies that present extremely bleak and sombre themes. Weinberg’s 21st, subtitled ‘Kaddish’, is dedicated to the victims of the Warsaw Ghetto, and various quotations support this, from use of Mahler’s Des Knaben Wunderhorn, through to a reworking of Weinberg’s Fourth String Quartet of 45 years earlier, and haunting solo piano quotes from Chopin’s First Ballade that permeate a brooding canvas of mourning. The Chopin reference and clear Klezmer sections strengthen the depiction of pre-war Warsaw, and the piece’s dedication to the victims of the Ghetto. Various other quotes from Weinberg’s oeuvre surface, and can surely be read as reflective of his life’s work, especially as it is explicitly a memorial piece. One of the key moments comes in the final section, as a wordless boy soprano intones a mournful sighing motif, answered by a wordless soprano (Maria Makeeva) (itself suggestive of loss between mother and child). The work was certainly positively received by the audience, with a huge number of ovations and curtain calls. The work was recorded for the option of future release, so watch this space.
            Usually, it would be alarming to think that Shostakovich’s Fifteenth Symphony could be the ‘light relief’ of any concert, but it proved to be such here. The opening movement, described as a ‘Toyshop’ by the composer, was performed with remarkable aplomb the by the gathered forces of the CBSO and Kremerata Baltica, while the quotations from Rossini'sWilliam Tell were handled with a subtlety that is unusual in most performances. The following movements switch to a far bleaker outlook, with star turns for solo cello and trombone in between Mahler-esque funeral dirges by the brass. The Scherzo was taken at something of a ‘safe’ tempo, though its sarcastic character was still easily conveyed. The finale of the Shostakovich is perhaps the most baffling movement of all, with Wagner and Glinka quotes contained within, presenting a culmination of his recognisably ‘Shostakovichian’ mode of despondency through major-key (or ‘happy’) music.
            The concert itself was a triumph, and Gražinytė-Tyla was captivating as leader of the orchestra. Every cue was flawless in execution, and the orchestra (and audience) are clearly held in awe with every movement.


The Weinberg weekend itself was a great success, and I look forward to future CBSO concerts with his music (next is 31 March 2019, with Kremer in Weinberg’s Violin Concerto, and the Fourth Suite from the Ballet The Golden Key - further info here). Long may Gražinytė-Tyla’s leadership of the CBSO continue, as well as their engagement with Weinberg’s music.

D.E.